Mr. Justice Belzil's order overturned 5 ERRORS OF LAW! by the Court of Appeal.
Why should we (the public) be subjected and penalized because of either, their incompetence, and/or absence of impartiality?? Please see attached Sorochan v. Bouchier, 2015 ABCA212".
2015abca212.pdf | |
File Size: | 214 kb |
File Type: |
III. Standard of Review
[15] The standard of review on appeal for questions of law is correctness. For questions of fact and questions of mixed fact and law, the standard is palpable and overriding error: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235.
[16] On the issue of causation or the trial judge’s application of the principles of causation to the facts, the standard of review is correctness because the issues of fact and law are extricable.
[17] The other issues raise questions of fact or questions of mixed fact and law for which the standard of review is palpable and overriding error.
[15] The standard of review on appeal for questions of law is correctness. For questions of fact and questions of mixed fact and law, the standard is palpable and overriding error: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235.
[16] On the issue of causation or the trial judge’s application of the principles of causation to the facts, the standard of review is correctness because the issues of fact and law are extricable.
[17] The other issues raise questions of fact or questions of mixed fact and law for which the standard of review is palpable and overriding error.